By viewing this site you have agreed to our disclaimer. This site is provided for entertainment purposes only. Nothing I say is advice, do your own research and consult a financial advisor.

Search This Blog

Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Potential Value to MHM Holders From the Silica Project Spin-off

As per my comments on the quarterly report I have conducted some research into the potential value of the silica project for exisiting MHM holders.. I posted these thoughts on Hotcopper and provide a copy of my post below:

Hi Guys,

I have done some research and most of the previous articles refer to the Silicon Smelter costing $500 million. I also found a few other mentions of Silicon Smelters in other parts of the world coming in at around the same price.

I also think it is important to consider that Management want MHM to be a sole Al/Salt Slag play and therefore will not retain the state in the Silicon Co at the company level (IMO). As a result we as shareholders either A. Get shares in the new company or B. Receive a one off capital return (following the sale of the project).

Seeing as the project is already going to cost $500m I don’t think the partner is going to want to pay MHM/MHM shareholders a large sum to take the project off our hands 100%. As a result we are left with option A. The company will be spun out and listed on the market (IMO).

So what could this mean?

-          Seeing as MHM have done a lot of the ground work and held this project for a number of years I would expect that we would get a minimum of 20% (any less and I would be disappointed in management).
-          The company who comes in and acquires the project would most likely want 50% IMO as a Silicon project is not like a Gold Mine where you dig it up and sell the stuff to anyone. The company that builds the plant will also be the one using the end product.
-          That leaves 30% to be raised via an IPO, which MHM shareholders can participate in as well.

Seeing as our 20% stake is “free”, i.e. we don’t have to pay any more money as we already own MHM shares. Then the $500m must be raised by the Major Partner and IPO. This would mean the Major partner contributes 62.5% of the money or $312.5million and the IPO the remaining 37.5% or $187.5 million. (NOTE: This money may not be raised all in one go as I doubt they could get that much coin less all DA and environmental approvals were in place. As a result that may be the “end figure” a year or so down the track after another CR along the way).

That would then imply that our 20% stake is “worth $83 million”. Calculated by taking $500m that it will cost to develop dividing by 120 (100 for the amount financed by other partners plus our 20% on top) to give a value relative to the projects total cost of $500m. (hope that makes sense – in other words of 20% is funded by others, but we still get the benefit).

Fully diluted MHM has 136,974,395 shares as a result our “implied” value in the project is worth 60 cents per share. However, obviously the Silicon Co once listed wont trade at $500m, given that the Major Partner will probably fund a large proportion of their investment via debt, not equity.

Assuming they kick in $125m in equity (40% of their required $312.5m), plus the $187.5m in equity from the IPO that would give a Market Cap of $312.5 million. And our 20% would be worth $52 million on market or 37.9 cents per share. (Assuming that the company trades at 100% of the equity kicked in). In the real world it will probably trade at less than this, but for arguments sake lets run with the figures

I know it seems like a lot of money, especially when you consider that our share price is under $1. But if this project is to go ahead then there will be a number of announcements along the way that will significantly boost the SP. On top of that we have progress in America. If this was to get our Share Price to $2 then an in-spec distribution of shares in a new company at 37.9 cents (would obviously be rounded up or down to a round figure) would account to less than 20% of the SP’s current value (0.379/$2). Which is definitely in the ballpark of possibilities IMO.

Anyway I just wanted to provide these figures to highlight the “potential” value of the project based on ONE possible scenario. Obviously management and our eventual partner may have different ideas.

As always please do your own research. Also this deal still has some way to go and the figures are very rough as a result. As more details emerge we will be able to work out with a lot more accuracy what the likely outcome is to be.

MHM Quarterly Announcement - To 31 Dec 2011

Yesterday MHM put out their Quarterly Report (to 31 Dec 2011) and my first impressions are that management cannot understand the poor performance on the share price. This is evident by the fact that the announcement starts off by stating our current cash reserves ($5.9 million), planned road shows for Australia, New York, London and Asia and the numerous references to financing that is non-dilutionary.

The international road shows are planned to take place before the end of March 2012 and are designed to inform and engage new investors. This initiative also follows the recent visit of the Geelong facility by a number of stockbrokers interested in publishing research on MHM. If all goes to plan I would expect that the next three to six months will deliver a constant flow of new broker reports which will hopefully garner some support for the company and its share price.

As, usual the rest of the report is broken down into our various operations. As a result I will do the same for my commentary.

Australian Operations:

For December 2011 quarter gross cash receipts were just over $1 million, with further trade receivables of $941,644. This obviously doesn’t look like a great figure but I have previously commented that it will not be until the end of the June quarter where we see results that represent a fully operational plant. The company all but confirmed this in the announcement by stating that the stockpile of partly-processed salt slag is expect to take 3 months to reduce. That would take us to the end of March 2011, we then need three months of full operation which takes us to the end of June, before the results are released in July.

On another positive front the customs paperwork issues with the AL80 have been resolved with the first shipment to depart by the end of February 2012. This has obviously been a trying process, but it was important that it was overcome to ensure that MHM is able to deliver on their stated profitability targets.

Finally, the salt crystalliser is facing some delays. This is not an issue for the Australian operations; however they do need to get it sorted for the American operations. They have plenty of time though as this would not need to be installed for another 6-9 months at a minimum.

American Operations:

The summary of the American operations is pretty much a re-hash of old information. The purchase of the building is however, expected to be funded from existing cash reserves. The purchase price is $835,000.

The update also included new information of the financial projections associated with the project. The preliminary budget estimate is US$25 million for the construction of a 250,000 tonne per annum plant. The targeted earnings, once operating at full capacity will be $25 million per annum. MHM also expects the plant to operate at full capacity (250,000 tonnes) within 12 months of commissioning. In case you missed that MHM stated 250,000 tonnes, not 200,000 which was the lower estimate they had previously provided.

The announcement then goes on to talk about the financial impacts which I have previously mentioned. It is clear that a capital raising is the least preferred option. And when you consider that the 24.3 million options that will expire on 31 August 2012 will generate $4.86m, plus our current cash position of circa $5 million and increase in profitability from this point forward (with full operations at our Australian facility) it is clear that even if there was a capital raising it would be very minor.

The financing will be finalised following the completion of the plant design, costing and scheduling with are due in the coming months.

Silica Division:

For those of you who have been following my blog for some time you may recall that I stated a couple of months back that the Silica project was, in my opinion, 12 – 24 months away. There was then a news article shortly after which provided some speculation on the project and I changed my opinion to say news may be closer than we think. Well, it certainly is close. Perhaps less than six months away with the announcement stating that “MHM is actively engaged with corporate advisers and has a targeted timeframe of concluding any spin-off by mid-2012, depending on marketing conditions”.

Obviously such as statement would not be made unless MHM thought they were close to finalising a deal. I will provide some further analysis on what this deal may be worth to MHM holders shortly.

Exploration Projects:

As the market has previously been information MHM is looking to divest all other exploration projects. This will save MHM $300,000 in expenditure per annum.

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Kentor Gold: Trading Update & Consolidation

Hi Everyone,

I thought I would do another update on the parcel of Kentor shares I am holding my my "trading account". Obviously I had expected news on Andash by now but the share price seems to be holding up okay and as I result I have not sold any of the shares.

As I previously mentioned I am happy to hold the shares until Andash approval because I do believe Kentor will get the go ahead. In the meantime, if the share price was to go to 14 cents I would take profits and try and re-enter a cent or two lower if possible. Obviously I run the risk of missing out on the news but a circa 30% gain is decent in itself. It would also give me the opportunity to trade KGL again, thus maximising my profit potential.

Complicating the matter is however the fact that Kentor Gold is consolidating the registry (1 for 10). I would have preferred to have exited my trading position prior to this in case there is any weakness when we re-open. As a result I will be monitoring the action closely over the next few days. I don't believe there will be enough weakness to force me to sell my trading stake, but it is something that I think I need to monitor, just in case.

There are of course benefits to consolidation, such as more institutions being able to join the register and other private investors becoming more interested in a stock with a $ sign in front of it. Either way it should be an interesting period for Kentor Gold and hopefully news is forthcoming in the very near term.

Finally, The chart continues to remain in fairly good shape so there is no reason to loose any sleep in this area just yet, especially well I am still sitting on a paper profit of circa 15%.

Monday, January 23, 2012

Weekly Update: Week Ending 20 January 2012

To calculate the weekly performance on my portfolio I take the close from last Friday to work out the percentage increase/decrease in each stock. This is compared to the ASX 200 (Code: XJO) and the Small Ords (XSO). The Small Ords is comprised of companies included in the ASX 300 index, but not in the ASX 100 index. I include the Small Ords in my comparison as it helps highlight the markets appetite for risk.


Market:
Close (Friday 13/01/12):
Close (Friday 20/01/12):
Percentage Change:
XJO
4195
4239
1.05%
XSO
2314
2374
2.59%


The Aussie market continued to push higher last week with the ASX 200 adding 1.05% and the Small Ords gaining a fairly solid 2.59%. Unfortunately this same optimism could not be spread across my other stocks with both MHM and Kentor Gold down.


Code:
Weighting:
Share Price Friday (13/01/2012)
Share Price Friday (20/01/2012)
Percentage Change:
Weighted Change:
OBJ
17.81%
0.018
0.019
5.56%
0.99%
MHM
18.39%
0.915
0.865
-5.46%
-1.00%
KGL
29.49%
0.130
0.125
-3.85%
-1.13%
Trading
14.29%
0.130
0.125
-3.85%
-0.55%
Cash
20.02%


0%
0.00%
TOTAL
100.00%


-2.534%
-1.70%


Kentor dropped 0.05 cents to close at 12.5 cents and MHM fell another 5.46% to 86.5cents. There was however a broker visit at the MHM plant in Victoria last week that was attended by a number of brokers. Hopefully this results in some positive press coverage which can finally support the share price which continues to lag. My main concern is back on the potential of a capital raising at the moment. This stock drops so hard at the hint of bad news (Euro crisis, etc) that I don’t think a cap raising will be viewed too favourably.

OBJ was however the standout for the week. It had previously hit 0.017 but managed to rebound strongly on Friday and close up at 0.019, a gain on 5.56% for the week. Overall the portfolio was down 1.70%.


Code:
Weighting:
Share Price Friday (13/01/2012)
Share Price Friday (20/01/2012)
Percentage Change:
Weighted Change:
OBJ
22.27%
0.018
0.019
5.56%
1.24%
MHM
23.00%
0.915
0.865
-5.46%
-1.26%
KGL
36.87%
0.130
0.125
-3.85%
-1.42%
Trading
17.87%
0.130
0.125
-3.85%
-0.69%
TOTAL
100.00%



-2.12%


Removing cash shows the extent of the falls and how badly the portfolio fared this week. A loss of 2.12% is not pretty when the broader market performed reasonably well.


Code:
Weighting:
Purchase Price
Current Price:
Percentage Change:
Weighted Change:
OBJ
22.94%
0.023
0.019
-17.39%
-3.99%
MHM
22.29%
1.100
0.865
-21.36%
-4.76%
KGL
22.41%
0.098
0.125
27.55%
6.17%
TOTAL
67.63%



-2.58%


Overall the portfolio remains 2.58% underwater